E-learning dalam pendidikan sistem informasi: systematic literature review tentang keterlibatan mahasiswa dan hasil belajar (2020–2025)

  • Alzet Rama 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Wiki Lofandri
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan tinggi telah mendorong adopsi e-learning secara masif, termasuk dalam bidang pendidikan sistem informasi (IS). Meski demikian, pemahaman mendalam tentang bagaimana e-learning memengaruhi student engagement dan learning outcomes dalam konteks IS educationkhususnya di negara berkembang seperti Indonesiamasih sangat terbatas dalam literatur akademik. Penelitian ini bertujuan mensintesis bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh e-learning terhadap keterlibatan mahasiswa dan capaian pembelajaran dalam pendidikan sistem informasi, termasuk faktor moderasi dan implikasinya bagi TVET. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan protokol PRISMA dilakukan terhadap 45 artikel terpilih dari Scopus, Web of Science, dan Google Scholar (2020–2025). Analisis tematik dilakukan menggunakan Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Temuan mengidentifikasi enam tema utama: (1) pengaruh positif e-learning terhadap behavioral dan cognitive engagement; (2) peningkatan learning outcomes pada pembelajaran berbasis LMS; (3) peran kritis desain instruksional dan kualitas platform; (4) interaksi dosen-mahasiswa sebagai moderator terkuat; (5) tantangan implementasi di negara berkembang; dan (6) keterbatasan penelitian khusus TVET dalam bidang IS. E-learning secara konsisten mendukung engagement dan outcomes mahasiswa IS apabila disertai desain instruksional berkualitas dan dukungan institusional yang memadai. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoritis dalam pengembangan kerangka e-learning kontekstual untuk TVET bidang IS, sekaligus mengidentifikasi gap penelitian yang perlu diprioritaskan.

Keywords
  • E-learning; sistem informasi; student engagement; learning outcomes; TVET; systematic literature review; PRISMA
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021). Emergency Online Learning In Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies. Education Sciences, 11(1), 24. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Educsci11010024
  2. Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2020). College Students' Use And Acceptance Of Emergency Online Learning Due To Covid-19. International Journal Of Educational Research Open, 1, 100011. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ijedro.2020.100011
  3. Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-Learning Systems Success: An Empirical Study. Computers In Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Chb.2019.08.004
  4. Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-Learning Critical Success Factors During The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Analysis Of E-Learning Managerial Perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Educsci10090216
  5. Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts Of The Covid-19 Pandemic On Life Of Higher Education Students: A Global Perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su12208438
  6. Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition To Online Education In Schools During A Sars-Cov-2 Coronavirus (Covid-19) Pandemic In Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), Em0060. Https://Doi.Org/10.29333/Pr/7937
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis In Psychology. Qualitative Research In Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. Https://Doi.Org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Butnaru, G. I., Niță, V., Anichiti, A., & Brînză, G. (2021). The Effectiveness Of Online Education During Covid-19 Pandemica Comparative Analysis Between The Perceptions Of Academic Students And High School Students From Romania. Sustainability, 13(9), 5311. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su13095311
  9. Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2022). The Acceptance Of Learning Management Systems And Video Conferencing Technologies: Lessons Learned From Covid-19. Technology, Knowledge And Learning, 27(4), 1311–1333. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10758-021-09561-Y
  10. Chang, M. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2021). Instructional Design For Higher-Order Thinking In Is Education: Problem-Based Learning Approaches. Journal Of Information Systems Education, 32(1), 12–27.
  11. Dhawan, S. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea In The Time Of Covid-19 Crisis. Journal Of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0047239520934018
  12. Firat, M. (2023). Determining The Effects Of Lms Learning Behaviors On Academic Achievement In A Learning Analytic Perspective. Journal Of Information Technology Education, 22, 1–25. Https://Doi.Org/10.28945/5085
  13. Garcia-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2021). The Transformation Of Higher Education After The Covid Disruption: Emerging Challenges In An Online Learning Scenario. Frontiers In Psychology, 12, 616059. Https://Doi.Org/10.3389/Fpsyg.2021.616059
  14. Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2019). Visible Learning Insights. Routledge.
  15. Hew, K. F., Jia, C., Gonda, D. E., & Bai, S. (2020). Transitioning To The 'New Normal' Of Learning In Unpredictable Times: Pedagogical Practices And Learning Performance In Fully Online Flipped Classrooms. International Journal Of Educational Technology In Higher Education, 17(1), 57. Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/S41239-020-00234-X
  16. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching And Online Learning. Educause Review. Https://Er.Educause.Edu/Articles/2020/3/The-Difference-Between-Emergency-Remote-Teaching-And-Online-Learning
  17. Huang, Q., Zheng, H., & Liu, Y. (2021). Flipped Classroom For Information Systems Education: Effects On Academic Achievement And Critical Thinking. Computers & Education, 168, 104198. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2021.104198
  18. Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital Transformation Of Everyday Life – How Covid-19 Pandemic Transformed The Basic Education Of The Young Generation And Why Information Management Research Should Care? International Journal Of Information Management, 55, 102183. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ijinfomgt.2020.102183
  19. Kabilan, M. K., Annamalai, N., & Al-Kaabi, A. G. (2021). Online Learning During Covid-19: A Study Of Tvet Students' Learning Experiences In Malaysia. International Journal Of Learning, Teaching And Educational Research, 20(7), 94–112. Https://Doi.Org/10.26803/Ijlter.20.7.6
  20. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues And Challenges For Teaching Successful Online Courses In Higher Education. Journal Of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0047239516661713
  21. Kite, J., Schlub, T. E., Zhang, Y., Chalmers, S., Flatau, P., & Gale, M. (2021). Exploring Lecturer And Student Perceptions And Experiences Of Digital Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study. Journal Of Learning And Teaching, 14(2), 1–17.
  22. Kuo, Y.-C., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2021). E-Learning Technology Acceptance: A Longitudinal Investigation Of The Mediating Effects Of User Engagement. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 228–259. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0735633120959070
  23. Lim, C. P., Tinio, V., Smith, M. S., & Bhatt, S. (2021). E-Learning In Higher Education In Asia Pacific: Issues And Challenges. Asia Pacific Journal Of Education, 41(1), 1–11. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1876764
  24. Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions On The Importance Of Engagement Strategies In The Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. Https://Doi.Org/10.24059/Olj.V22i1.1092
  25. Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2020). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When And How. Routledge.
  26. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews And Meta-Analyses: The Prisma Statement. Plos Medicine, 6(7), E1000097. Https://Doi.Org/10.1371/Journal.Pmed.1000097
  27. Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations To A Face-To-Face Initial Teacher Education Course 'Forced' Online Due To The Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal Of Education For Teaching, 46(4), 609–611. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
  28. Mpungose, C. B. (2021). Emergent Transition From Face-To-Face To Online Learning In A South African University In The Context Of The Coronavirus Pandemic. Humanities And Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 113. Https://Doi.Org/10.1057/S41599-020-00603-X
  29. Navarro, R., López, H., & García, M. (2021). E-Learning Satisfaction Among University Students In Mexico: The Role Of Content Quality And Instructor Interaction. Journal Of Computers In Education, 8(3), 401–422. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S40692-021-00183-6
  30. Nguyen, T. (2020). The Effectiveness Of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference And Future Horizons. Merlot Journal Of Online Learning And Teaching, 11(2), 309–319.
  31. Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The Prisma 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline For Reporting Systematic Reviews. Bmj, 372, N71. Https://Doi.Org/10.1136/Bmj.N71
  32. Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning During Covid-19: The Role Of Self-Regulated Learning, Motivation, And Procrastination For Perceived Competence. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393–418. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11618-021-01002-X
  33. Rahiem, M. D. H. (2021). The Emergency Remote Learning Experience Of University Students In Indonesia Amidst The Covid-19 Crisis. International Journal Of Learning, Teaching And Educational Research, 19(6), 1–26. Https://Doi.Org/10.26803/Ijlter.19.6.1
  34. Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges In The Online Component Of Blended Learning: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2019.103701
  35. Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2021). Social Isolation And Acceptance Of The Learning Management System (Lms) In The Time Of Covid-19 Pandemic: An Expansion Of The Utaut Model. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183–208. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0735633120960421
  36. Rohman, A., Sudjimat, D. A., & Arifin, Z. (2023). E-Learning Implementation In Vocational High Schools: Challenges And Opportunities In Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 1–15. Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Jpv.V13i1.51234
  37. Sahu, P. (2020). Closure Of Universities Due To Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): Impact On Education And Mental Health Of Students And Academic Staff. Cureus, 12(4), E7541. Https://Doi.Org/10.7759/Cureus.7541
  38. Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education In The United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
  39. Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical Success Factors For E-Learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2005.09.004
  40. Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review Of Definitions Of Online Learning. American Journal Of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
  41. Sun, P.-C., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2016). Analysis Of Learners' Post-Adoption Usage Behavior On E-Learning Courses. Computers In Human Behavior, 55, 263–274.
  42. Tang, Y. M., Chen, P. C., Law, K. M. Y., Wu, C. H., Lau, Y., Guan, J., ... & Ho, G. T. S. (2022). Comparative Analysis Of Student's Live Online Learning Readiness During The Coronavirus (Covid-19) Pandemic In The Higher Education Sector. Computers & Education, 168, 104211. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2021.104211
  43. Teo, T., Huang, F., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2020). Explicating The Influences That Explain Intention To Use Technology Among English Teachers In China. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 64–78. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1537757
  44. Tratnik, A., Urh, M., & Jereb, E. (2021). Student Satisfaction With An Online And A Face-To-Face Business English Course In A Higher Education Context. Innovations In Education And Teaching International, 56(1), 36–45. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1374875
  45. Unesco. (2020). Covid-19 Educational Disruption And Response. Unesco. Https://En.Unesco.Org/Covid19/Educationresponse
  46. Widodo, A., Dewi, I. N., & Susilawati, S. (2022). E-Learning In Vocational Education In Indonesia: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 28(1), 55–68. Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Jptk.V28i1.42345
  47. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review Of Research On Artificial Intelligence Applications In Higher Educationwhere Are The Educators? International Journal Of Educational Technology In Higher Education, 16(1), 39. Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/S41239-019-0171-0

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 2 times
PDF
: 0 times