Analisis Bibliometrik Integrasi IoT dalam Laboratorium Virtual Teknik: Tren Global dan Kesenjangan Penelitian 2020–2025

  • Wiki Lofandri 
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia
  • Alzet Rama
    Universitas Negeri Padang
    Indonesia

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan teknik mendorong integrasi Internet of Things (IoT) ke dalam laboratorium virtual sebagai alternatif praktikum yang fleksibel, efisien, dan kontekstual dengan tuntutan industri 4.0. Penelitian ini bertujuan memetakan tren, pola kolaborasi, dan evolusi tematik riset mengenai IoT dalam laboratorium virtual pendidikan teknik melalui analisis bibliometrik berbasis database Scopus periode 2020–2025. Menggunakan strategi pencarian Boolean pada field Title-Abstract-Keywords, diperoleh 69 dokumen final (20 artikel jurnal dan 49 prosiding konferensi) yang dianalisis menggunakan VOSviewer dan Bibliometrix/Biblioshiny. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa publikasi bersifat fluktuatif dengan puncak pada 2021 (n=16) dan pertumbuhan kembali meningkat pada 2023 2025. Italia, India, Ukraina, dan Spanyol mendominasi produksi pengetahuan, sementara Indonesia muncul sebagai kontributor ASEAN dengan 5 dokumen namun tingkat sitasi yang masih sangat rendah. Analisis ko-kemunculan kata kunci mengidentifikasi tiga kluster tematik utama: infrastruktur IoT dan lab virtual, pedagogi e-learning berbasis teknologi, serta teknologi imersif (VR/AR). Mayoritas penelitian didominasi prosiding konferensi (71%) dan belum cukup merepresentasikan konteks TVET di negara berkembang. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi peluang riset strategis yang sangat signifikan bagi peneliti pendidikan vokasi Indonesia untuk berkontribusi dalam wacana global yang masih terbuka luas.

Keywords
  • Internet of Things, laboratorium virtual, pendidikan teknik informatika, TVET, bibliometrik Scopus
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References
  1. Abekiri, N., Lenzini, L., & Karimi, M. (2023). Platform For Hands-On Remote Labs Based On The Esp32 And Nod-Red. Scientific African, 20, E01627. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Sciaf.2023.E01627
  2. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-Tool For Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal Of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Joi.2017.08.007
  3. Benitez, V. H., Rueda, A., Merchan, L., Mena, J., & Morales, M. (2020). Design Of An Affordable Iot Open Source Robot Arm For Online Teaching Of Robotics Courses During The Pandemic Contingency. Hardwarex, 8, E00152. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ohx.2020.E00152
  4. Burghardt, M., Heckner, M., & Wolff, C. (2021). Integration Of New Technologies And Alternative Methods In Laboratory-Based Scenarios. Advances In Intelligent Systems And Computing, 1231, 284–291. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_24
  5. Casillo, M., Colace, F., Lombardi, M., Lorusso, A., Santaniello, D., & Valentino, C. (2021). Viot_Lab: A Virtual Remote Laboratory For Internet Of Things Based On Thingsboard Platform. Proceedings – Frontiers In Education Conference, Fie. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Fie49875.2021.9637281
  6. Coelho, P. A., Fernández-Solano, A. J., & Guarneros-Nolasco, L. R. (2024). Challenge-Based Learning And Scrum As Enablers Of 4.0 Technologies In Engineering Education. Applied Sciences, 14(2), 621. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/App14020621
  7. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How To Conduct A Bibliometric Analysis: An Overview And Guidelines. Journal Of Business Research, 133, 285–296. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jbusres.2021.04.070
  8. García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Rivero-Ortega, R., Rodríguez-Conde, M. J., & Rodríguez-García, N. (2021). Impact Of The Covid-19 On Higher Education: An Experience-Based Approach. In F. J. García-Peñalvo (Ed.), Information Technology Trends For A Global And Interdisciplinary Research Community (Pp. 1 18). Igi Global. Https://Doi.Org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4156-2.Ch001
  9. Hernandez-De-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Technologies For The Future Of Learning: State Of The Art. International Journal On Interactive Design And Manufacturing, 14(2), 683–695. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S12008-019-00640-0
  10. Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Statistik Smk 2022/2023. Pusdatin Kemendikbudristek.
  11. Romagnoli, G., Monfared, R. P., & Uckelmann, D. (2020). Lab Networks In Engineering Education: A Proposed Structure For Organizing Information. International Journal Of Online And Biomedical Engineering, 16(14), 4–19. Https://Doi.Org/10.3991/Ijoe.V16i14.17703
  12. Tobarra, L., Pastor-Vargas, R., Robles-Gómez, A., Haut, J. M., & Duque, E. (2021). Analyzing The Users' Acceptance Of An Iot Cloud Platform Using The Utaut/Tam Model. Ieee Access, 9, 119219–119235. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Access.2021.3107893
  13. Abdullah, K. H., Gazali, N., Muzawi, R., Syam, E., Roslan, M. F., & Sofyan, D. (2024). Internet Of Things (Iot) In Education: A Bibliometric Review. International Journal Of Information Science And Management, 22(1), 183–202. Https://Doi.Org/10.22034/Ijism.2023.1977600.0
  14. Unesco-Unevoc. (2023). Reimagining Tvet For A Post-Covid World: Towards A New Humanist Approach. Unesco-Unevoc.
  15. Chiang, F. K., Shang, X., & Qiao, L. (2022). Augmented Reality In Vocational Training: A Systematic Review Of Research And Applications. Computers Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Chb.2021.107125 In Human Behavior, 129, 107125.
  16. Delcker, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Teachers’ Perspective On Digital Transformation Of Vocational Schools In Germany. European Journal Of Education, 56(1), 73–86. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/Ejed.12430
  17. Fuertes, J. J., Prada, M. A., Rodríguez-Ossorio, J. R., González-Herbón, R., Pérez, D., & Domínguez, M. (2021). Environment For Education On Industry 4.0. Ieee Access, 9, 144395–144405. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Access.2021.3120517
  18. Garcés-Giraldo, L., Patiño-Vanegas, J., Espinosa, R., Benjumea-Arias, M., Valencia-Arias, A., & Lampen, M. C. (2023). Internet Of Things – Iot Research Trends From A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal Of Information Systems Engineering And Management, 8(1), 18894. Https://Doi.Org/10.55267/Iadt.07.13309
  19. Lei, Z., Zhou, H., Hu, W., & Liu, G. P. (2022). Toward An International Platform: A Web-Based Multi-Language System For Remote And Virtual Laboratories Using React Framework. Heliyon, 8(10), E10780. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Heliyon.2022.E10780
  20. Li, J., Liang, W., & Lavi, R. (2024). Effectiveness Of Virtual Laboratory In Engineering Education: A Meta Analysis. Plos One, 19(12), E0316269. Https://Doi.Org/10.1371/Journal.Pone.0316269
  21. Lin, Z. (2023). A Meta-Analysis Of The Effects Of Augmented Reality Technologies In Interactive Learning Environments (2012–2022). Computer Applications In Engineering Education, 31(5), 1111–1131. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Cae.22628
  22. Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A., & Pellas, N. (2022). A Systematic Mapping Review Of Augmented Reality Applications To Support Stem Learning In Higher Education. Education And Information Technologies, 27(2), 1883–1927. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10639-021-10682-1
  23. Othman, A. B., Yusof, M., & Yusof, N. (2024). Challenges Of Digitalisation In Tvet: A Recent Comprehensive Structured Review. International Journal Of Learning, Teaching And Educational Research, 23(9), 1–25. Https://Doi.Org/10.26803/Ijlter.23.9.1
  24. Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual Laboratories For Education In Science, Technology, And Engineering: A Review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2016.02.002
  25. Radhamani, R., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B., & Diwakar, S. (2021). What Virtual Laboratory Usage Tells Us About Laboratory Skill Education Pre- And Post-Covid-19: Focus On Usage, Behavior, Intention And Adoption. Education And Information Technologies, 26(6), 7477–7495. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10639-021-10583-3
  26. Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nair, V. K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022). Virtual Laboratories– A Historical Review And Bibliometric Analysis Of The Past Three Decades. Education And Information Technologies, 27(8), 11055 11087. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10639-022-11058-9
  27. Rasyid, R. E., Aisa, S., & Rizal, A. (2024). Global Trends And Contributions Of Internet Of Things (Iot) Research In Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Mimbar Ilmu, 29(3), 500–506. Https://Doi.Org/10.23887/Mi.V29i3.89589
  28. Reeves, S. M., & Crippen, K. J. (2021). Virtual Laboratories In Undergraduate Science And Engineering Courses: A Systematic Review, 2009–2019. Journal Of Science Education And Technology, 30(1), 16–30. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10956-020-09866-0
  29. Roy, R., Babakerkhell, M. D., Mukherjee, S., Pal, D., & Funilkul, S. (2023). Development Of A Framework For Metaverse In Education: A Systematic Literature Review Approach. Ieee Access, 11, 57717–57734. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Access.2023.3283273
  30. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software Survey: Vosviewer, A Computer Program For Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11192-009-0146-3
  31. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2010). A Unified Approach To Mapping And Clustering Of Bibliometric Networks. Journal Of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Joi.2010.07.002
  32. Mishra, D., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., & Wamba, S. (2016). Vision, Applications And Future Challenges Of Internet Of Things: A Bibliometric Study Of The Recent Literature. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(7), 1331–1355. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/Imds-11-2015 0478
  33. Theodoropoulos, A., Antoniou, A., & Lepouras, G. (2023). Augmented And Virtual Reality For Stem Education: A Systematic Review Of Empirical Evidence. Education Sciences, 13(3), 257. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Educsci13030257
  34. Achuthan, K., Francis, S. P., & Diwakar, S. (2017). Augmented Reflective Learning And Knowledge Retention Perceived Among Students In Classrooms Involving Virtual Laboratories. Education And Information Technologies, 22(6), 2825–2855. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10639-017-9626-X
  35. Marques, M. A., Viegas, M. C., Costa-Lobo, M. C., Fidalgo, A. V., Alves, G. R., Rocha, J. S., & Gustavsson, I. (2014). How Remote Labs Impact On Course Outcomes: Various Practices Using Visir. Ieee Transactions On Education, 57(3), 151–159. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Te.2013.2284156
  36. Gomes, L., & Bogosyan, S. (2009). Current Trends In Remote Laboratories. Ieee Transactions On Industrial Electronics, 56(12), 4744–4756. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Tie.2009.2033293
  37. Heradio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual And Remote Labs In Education: A Bibliometric Analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14–38. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2016.03.010
  38. Achuthan, K., Raghavan, D., Shankar, B., Francis, S. P., & Kolil, V. K. (2021). Impact Of Remote Experimentation, Interactivity And Platform Effectiveness On Laboratory Learning Outcomes. International Journal Of Educational Technology In Higher Education, 18(1), 38. Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/S41239 021-00272
  39. Estriegana, R., Medina-Merodio, J. A., & Barchino, R. (2019). Student Acceptance Of Virtual Laboratory And Practical Work: An Extension Of The Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 135, 1–14. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Compedu.2019.02.010

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 32 times
PDF
: 17 times