Interactive flipbook-based e-modules and fifth-grade students' learning outcomes in the properties of light: a quasi-experimental study with baseline adjustment
-
Published: October 17, 2026
-
Page: 1-15
Abstract
Properties of light are difficult for elementary students because the underlying processes can only be observed through their effects, and flipbook-based e-modules are often promoted as a way to make these processes visible. Most evidence for such e-modules, however, comes from development studies and single-group pre-test–post-test comparisons. This study tested whether an interactive flipbook-based e-module produced higher learning outcomes on the properties of light than regular instruction once pre-existing achievement was taken into account. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test control-group design was used with two intact fifth-grade classes at a public elementary school in Indonesia (N = 22; experimental n = 12, control n = 10). Both classes took the same 0–100 achievement test before and after instruction. The experimental class started 11.92 points higher (Hedges g = 0.73), so the primary analysis was an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the pre-test as covariate, supported by permutation, bootstrap, rank-based, and robust sensitivity analyses. Both classes improved substantially, by about 33 and 35 points. After baseline adjustment, the e-module class did not outperform the control class, F(1, 19) = 0.25, p = .626, partial η² = .013; adjusted difference = −3.38 points, 95% CI [−17.65, 10.90], and all sensitivity analyses agreed. The e-module was therefore not superior to regular instruction in this setting, although the small sample cannot exclude moderate effects in either direction. The study also shows that within-group gains and normalised gain can overstate the benefit of digital learning materials when baseline differences between intact classes are ignored.
- elementary science education
- interactive e-module
- learning outcomes
- properties of light
- quasi-experimental design

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Abdinejad, M., Talaie, B., Qorbani, H. S., & Dalili, S. (2021). Student perceptions using augmented reality and 3D visualization technologies in chemistry education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09880-2
- Al-Ansi, A. M., Jaboob, M., Garad, A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), Article 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532
- Alyusfitri, R., Gistituati, N., Yerizon, Fauzan, A., & Yarman. (2024). The effectiveness and relationship of student responses toward learning outcomes using interactive multimedia-based e-modules in elementary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 16(5), 573–584. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/2203
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
- Arina, N., Mustaji, Kholidya, C. F., Rulviana, V., Rapii, M., & Wardana, N. A. D. (2025). The effectiveness of e-module use on the science learning outcomes of sixth-grade primary school students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(12), 1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i12.13593
- Bendall, S., Goldberg, F., & Galili, I. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers' prior knowledge about light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1169–1187. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300912
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Fetherstonhaugh, T., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Students' understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change. Science Education, 76(6), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760606
- Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
- Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, Article 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
- Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798
- Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
- Lase, K. S., & Sudarma, I. K. (2023). Interactive e-module based on scientific approach in science content learning for sixth-grade students. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 11(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v11i2.64508
- Mahmudah, S., Kirana, T., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2022). Profile of students' critical thinking ability: Implementation of e-modul based on problem-based learning. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(4), 478–488. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i4.231
- Maulidya, S. A., & Zulherman. (2024). 1stFlip flipbook creator-assisted e-module to advance learning quality in elementary schools. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i2.78076
- Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
- Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312
- Métioui, A. (2023). Primary school preservice teachers' alternative conceptions about light interaction with matter (reflection, refraction, and absorption) and shadow size changes on Earth and Sun. Education Sciences, 13(5), Article 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050462
- Munzil, M., Affriyenni, Y., Mualifah, S., Fardhani, I., Fitriyah, I. J., & Muntholib, M. (2022). Development of problem based learning based e-modules in the form of flipbooks on environmentally friendly technology materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 10(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v10i1.21807
- Nissen, J. M., Talbot, R. M., Nasim Thompson, A., & Van Dusen, B. (2018). Comparison of normalized gain and Cohen's d for analyzing gains on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), Article 010115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115
- Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
- Rohmatin, I. A., Rachmayani, A., & Jumadi, J. (2022). Development of e-module based on flipbook learning model problem based learning (PBL) to improve critical thinking ability. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i3.13655
- Sabil, H., Asrial, A., Syahrial, S., Kiska, N. D., Saputri, J., Damayanti, L., Luthfiah, Q., & Silvia, N. (2023). Problem-based learning flipbook e-module in improving students' critical thinking skills in "Always Save Energy" thematic learning. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i1.58306
- Saralee, A., Fitria, Y., Sukma, E., & Hidayati, A. (2024). The development of e-module IPAS based on problem based learning assisted with articulate applications to improve students' critical thinking. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(4), 2032–2040. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i4.7014
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- Šimkovic, M., & Träuble, B. (2019). Robustness of statistical methods when measure is affected by ceiling and/or floor effect. PLOS ONE, 14(8), Article e0220889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220889
- Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
- Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
- Vickers, A. J., & Altman, D. G. (2001). Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ, 323(7321), 1123–1124. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
- Widiana, F. H., & Rosy, B. (2021). Pengembangan e-modul berbasis flipbook maker pada mata pelajaran teknologi perkantoran. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 3728–3739. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1265
- Winatha, K. R. (2018). Pengembangan e-modul interaktif berbasis proyek mata pelajaran simulasi digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 15(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v15i2.14021